Real-Time Data Processing with Kafka and Flink
10 min read
by AkshayData EngineeringKafkaFlinkDistributed Systems
Real-Time Data Processing with Kafka and Flink
When your data platform needs to process billions of events per day with near real-time latency, traditional batch processing won't cut it. Here's how we built a streaming data platform that scales.
The Challenge
Our requirements:
- Process 5B+ events daily
- <1 second end-to-end latency
- Exactly-once semantics
- Complex event processing (CEP)
- Integration with existing data warehouse
Architecture
Event Sources → Kafka → Flink → Clickhouse
↓ ↓
S3 Archive Real-time Dashboards
Why Kafka?
Kafka provides the durability and scalability we need:
- Horizontal scaling: Add brokers as load increases
- Replication: Fault tolerance built-in
- Retention: Historical replay for debugging
- Schema evolution: Integration with Schema Registry
Why Flink?
Flink offers true stream processing with:
- Exactly-once processing: Critical for financial data
- Event time processing: Handle out-of-order events
- Rich operators: Windows, joins, CEP patterns
- Savepoints: Zero-downtime deployments
Key Implementation Details
1. Schema Management
We use Confluent Schema Registry with Avro:
KafkaAvroDeserializer deserializer = new KafkaAvroDeserializer();
GenericRecord record = deserializer.deserialize(topic, data);
2. Watermark Strategy
Handling late events correctly:
WatermarkStrategy
.<Event>forBoundedOutOfOrderness(Duration.ofSeconds(20))
.withTimestampAssigner((event, timestamp) -> event.getTimestamp());
3. Exactly-Once Semantics
Configure both Kafka and Flink for exactly-once:
env.enableCheckpointing(60000);
env.getCheckpointConfig().setCheckpointingMode(CheckpointingMode.EXACTLY_ONCE);
Scaling Strategies
- Partition by key: Ensure related events stay on same partition
- Replication factor: RF=3 for critical topics
- Parallelism: Match Flink parallelism to Kafka partitions
- Resource isolation: Separate clusters for different use cases
Monitoring
Critical metrics we track:
- Consumer lag (per partition)
- Processing latency (end-to-end)
- Checkpoint duration and failures
- Data skew across partitions
Results
After optimization:
- Throughput: 60K events/second sustained
- Latency: p99 < 500ms
- Availability: 99.95% uptime
- Cost: 40% reduction vs. previous solution
Lessons Learned
- Start small: Begin with a single use case and expand
- Monitor everything: You can't fix what you can't measure
- Plan for failures: Networks partition, disks fail, bugs happen
- Schema evolution: Plan for schema changes from day one
- Backpressure: Design for it, test for it, handle it gracefully
The complete code and infrastructure setup is available in my projects.